The end of the semester came as a shock this year and I never felt like there was a mad dash to finish or get anything finished, with the semester instead ending with a gentle coasting into finals. With only 4 classes (14 credits), I didn’t expect it to be all that difficult and my expectations were largely confirmed after coming back from spring break. In February, I may have freaked out a bit but it was largely unnecessary anxiety over the future and I think in a big way connected to feeling somewhat depressed with the state of the weather. So in my tradition of reviewing each course….
BEN 364: Quantitative physiology taught by Professor Andrew Darling was awesome! Learning about the human body puts me in a state of near continual awe and I found nearly every feature/system we talked about interesting. Throwing in a bit of math to make it quantitative didn’t hurt either. Professor Darling was highly dedicated to the course and seemed genuinely interested in the material. Difficulty was relatively low as an information based testing course. The physiology review packets given out before exams made studying a breeze, albiet a time consuming breeze but basically just busy work. The labs we did (4 total since the treadmill lab had to be canceled) were quite interesting but I didn’t care much for the way in which lab groups were made. Because of the mixing of report group size based on how many lab stations were functional for the different labs the assignment of who was supposed to do what part of labs was never really established. As a result, in combination with having the second exam the day before lab 4 was due I really, really screwed up the last lab and received what I think is the lowest score I’ve ever gotten on anything in college, coming in at an embarrassing 34% with the average being 60%. Thankfully, it seems my test scores were high enough to offset that failure and my overall grade was not affected.
BEN 575: Process Control taught by Professor John Heydweiller may in fact be the most dreaded undergraduate bioengineering/chemical engineering course. Despite that status, I didn’t really mind the course that much. I wouldn’t go so far as to say that I enjoyed it but it wasn’t nearly as difficult as what everyone claimed it to be. Professor Heydweiller had high expectations for what we should be able to learn and I think became frustrated when the class so obviously gave up and settled with the idea that the overall curve would save them. I greatly appreciated the fact that Professor Heydweiller held regular office hours every day and I utilized them as much as necessary for my own understanding. Working one-on-one with him to understand the material made everything significantly easier and I would highly recommend it except for the fact that Professor Heydweiller has now retired.
BEN 341: Heat and Mass Transfer taught by Professor George Martin was not what I had hoped by undergraduate heat transfer class would be like. I concede that Professor Martin does have an excellent understanding of the material, but he was not able to convey that knowledge through his teaching. I did not take advantage of Professor Martin’s office hours either, but have heard that he could be much more helpful in a one-on-one setting than he was during lecture while using the stock powerpoints or regaling us with interesting, but uneducational heat transfer stories. Fortunately, the TA, Fangchao, was great and recitations were very helpful to learning the material. Overall, I do think I gained a good understanding of everything that we covered but I’m nowhere near the confidence level I had leaving fluid transport last semester taught by Professor Mather.
PHI 378: Minds and Machines taught by Professor Robert van Gulick ranks among my favorite courses of all time. The philosophical side of creating artificial intelligence was generally quite interesting and I learned a lot about thinking, consciousness and what it means to be a person as well. This course probably actually changed my thinking relative to the world more than anything else I’ve taken and made me very much more aware of the intricacies of intelligence. I went into the course with a rather confident belief that Moore’s law riding on the back of other technological trends would result in a technological singularity in my lifetime but after having taking this course I am much more conservative in my expectations. Creating AI isn’t easy, and I actually agree with John Searle that strong AI is necessarily false when using a von Neumann architecture. From a functional standpoint, I’m not sure if this matters or not but I think having “intelligent” machines that lack consciousness is a pretty big problem. I don’t want to lapse into pure philosophy in my semester review though, so suffice it to say this course and Professor van Gulick were awesome!
.png)

.jpg)




